B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
| Author |
Message |
|
Kane
Gameop
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:00 am Posts: 1430 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
PT_Nation wrote: you guys don't seem fun at all and it seem everyone is here to fight, not very interesting gaming project... I've never seem that in any other mud, good luck with your game. You have a good point. It seems some people are missing that point.
_________________ Kane Big Game 2019 Ice 2020 HHT 2020
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:58 pm |
|
 |
|
flip
Chief Warrant Officer
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:00 am Posts: 110 Location: Canada
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
i read them for the drama.
so again can we have a perma corp game or not?
PR rule:)
laff US AND DF
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:00 pm |
|
 |
|
Kane
Gameop
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:00 am Posts: 1430 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Thanks Rp for trying. Maybe another time.
_________________ Kane Big Game 2019 Ice 2020 HHT 2020
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Bone Collector
Lieutenant J.G.
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 2:00 am Posts: 301
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
I dont see why you guys are still trying to run low participation games that harken back to the good ole days of TW. Why doesnt someone step up and start a new breed of games and promote the hell out of them in order to possibly bring in new/old talent?
_________________ Bone Collector
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
 |
|
Admin 1
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2000 3:00 am Posts: 1432 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
flip wrote: i read them for the drama.
so again can we have a perma corp game or not?
PR rule:)
laff US AND DF hey have a perma toruny! thats a great idea,,,,l
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
 |
|
Thrawn
Commander
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:00 am Posts: 1801 Location: Outer Rims
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Space Ghost wrote: Thrawn wrote: Space Ghost wrote: posting of His actions? i assume u mean his admitting to the cheating at the begining of the game that RP says he now owns up to?..I guess bringing it up over and over again MIGHT keep new players away from his server. I'm not convinced that isnt a bad thing...Maybe it will also remind Hosts to act Honestly and in good Faith...
Yes, this is a true point. It may hurt him, or he may be able to recover from it. Ok, so who decides "we need to discuss it more and more and more"? Is it us as moderators? SysOps? The players? I would assume as moderators we dont attempt to stem or direct any debate in a open discussion Forum that our Members(including ourselves) wish to engage in.....While i have been the most vocal ive hardly been the only member with an opionon on the matter.It should end when people stop posting to it or moved to smack if thats justified.Currently the Discussion couldnt really be considerered Smack except maybe Desert Fox's rant. How about the original people that created BOTE in its spirit and intent? I did not say "you were a mean bully who is hurting the game..." at all. I did not say I agree with you or RP. I can certainly see and understand both points of view from both of you. I'm neutral here, as a MODERATOR in this forum. I'm *suggesting* the approach could have been different without airing the dirty laundry in public. You suggestion is well recieved as stated earlier i did try to handle the matter privatly which is why there are no posts on it until he announced it publicly at that point well i had no choice. I'm *suggesting* that if the need to debate this must go on, then do it professionally. is the debate not professional? have i resorted to vulgarityies or even lies? If i am not conducting a profesional debate perhaps u can post or quote me privately the area's that you would consider unprofessional debate I'm *suggesting* as moderators we set the tone here. It is not doing anything positive to this game. If people wanted dramatics and theatrics, they could watch soaps on TV. The day i need to curtail my opinions about a game that i actually played in only because i moderate a forum will be the day JP can ask for my resignation.
I dont have any problem with you at all Thrawn you have pointed out some valid things I will in the Intrest of "Moving on" Change my Signature. But i wish to point out that i have as much right to express my point of view as you do.I think most people actually only read the forums for the Drama...IMO, by you posting that "RP did this or did that..." you are in fact steming or directing the debate. I can see it's a difficult line being both a moderator and a person that has been involved in this particular situation. We all have the right to our opinion. I'm looking at this from not just a moderator, but a SysOp that wants to draw more players in without all the drama. All I was *suggesting* is we mods have to be cautious of how we respond since we have a responsibility to represent both JP and TradeWars, do we not? Debating an issue is fine. Posting a signature that bashes the particular individual is NOT professional in my books. Perhaps I should have been more clear in my comment on keeping it professional. If you have such a strong issue with this or with RP, then perhaps allowing someone else to take this up rather than you may have been an idea. If I have an issue with someone, I'm certainly not going to post it in an Open Discussion forum for people to feed on and spin the issue into a full out bashing. I'm certainly not going to get drawn into a debate with you or anyone over whether I think you were being mean, whether RP is right or wrong. I'm posting my opinion as a mod and a SysOp from the view that seeing this in an Open Forum from a new player perspective is not making this game or forum look very appealing or fun.
_________________ -Thrawn
But risk has always been an inescapable part of warfare.
--
Knight to Queen's Bishop 3
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:23 pm |
|
 |
|
Admin 1
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2000 3:00 am Posts: 1432 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Thrawn wrote: IMO, by you posting that "RP did this or did that..." you are in fact steming or directing the debate. I can see it's a difficult line being both a moderator and a person that has been involved in this particular situation. We all have the right to our opinion. I'm looking at this from not just a moderator, but a SysOp that wants to draw more players in without all the drama. All I was *suggesting* is we mods have to be cautious of how we respond since we have a responsibility to represent both JP and TradeWars, do we not?
which is why i was careful to not say anything that he could deny...You don't see any denials because i can qoute where he said and admitted he did it. By that logic i should just move this to SMACK and your issue would be solved.
Debating an issue is fine. Posting a signature that bashes the particular individual is NOT professional in my books. Can you Bash someone by Quoting them? i didnt say it,,, i was Quoting him and what he said word for word so i only posted what he said
Perhaps I should have been more clear in my comment on keeping it professional. If you have such a strong issue with this or with RP, then perhaps allowing someone else to take this up rather than you may have been an idea.
sure ill let someone else fight my battles and let them be called SG's puppet..
If I have an issue with someone, I'm certainly not going to post it in an Open Discussion forum for people to feed on and spin the issue into a full out bashing. Oh i would.....I want hear everyone tell me im stupid or im right or im wrong...I want to hear from people i respect and others i hate...I mean it just wouldnt be the same if i couldnt get at least a Yawn from desert fox every once in a while. I enjoy a good Bashing when i can get one.
I'm certainly not going to get drawn into a debate with you or anyone over whether I think you were being mean, whether RP is right or wrong. I'm posting my opinion as a mod and a SysOp from the view that seeing this in an Open Forum from a new player perspective is not making this game or forum look very appealing or fun. I dont want to have a debate with you about whether you think RP did something right or wrong..You've previoulsy posted that you could see his side of things...Enuff said....BUT when have u ever seen a controversal tournament thread so civil??? If a new user really thinks that a forum thread about a game billed as "The Battle of the Elite" is something thats going to look appealing??? lets hope he doesnt read the Smack thread.
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:45 pm |
|
 |
|
Cerne
Gameop
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:00 am Posts: 991
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
SG,
What I like about you.... You grind axes until there is nothing but air.
Cerne.
_________________ "All warfare is based on deception..." - Art of War "Time will tell all tales" - SG Any advanced tactic in TW is indistinguishable from cheating.
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:58 pm |
|
 |
|
Thrawn
Commander
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:00 am Posts: 1801 Location: Outer Rims
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Space Ghost wrote: I dont want to have a debate with you about whether you think RP did something right or wrong..You've previoulsy posted that you could see his side of things...Enuff said....BUT when have u ever seen a controversal tournament thread so civil??? If a new user really thinks that a forum thread about a game billed as "The Battle of the Elite" is something thats going to look appealing??? lets hope he doesnt read the Smack thread.
As I said before, "I'm not discrediting either you or RP". If you have an issue that I can see his side, that is your issue. If anyone has an issue that I can ALSO see your side, that's their issue. This is an open discussion, and I am fine with that, providing it can be discussed with some level of professionalism or tact. I do not agree with the constant bashing of an individual in an Open Discussion. If there is a need to bash, then the topic can be moved to the Smack Talk area. I believe as Moderators, we should not engage in debating. If the members want to debate, then that is fine. I guess I look at being a Moderator differently. If I am incorrect in this view, then perhaps the "powers to be" would either be willing to tell me what guidelines to follow to know what is open discussion and what is smack/garbage. Or perhaps I need to be replaced as a moderator. Either way, I stand by my comments. My interest is the game, to get new players in the game, to be a help to the community here.
_________________ -Thrawn
But risk has always been an inescapable part of warfare.
--
Knight to Queen's Bishop 3
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:40 pm |
|
 |
|
Admin 1
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2000 3:00 am Posts: 1432 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Thrawn wrote: Space Ghost wrote: I dont want to have a debate with you about whether you think RP did something right or wrong..You've previoulsy posted that you could see his side of things...Enuff said....BUT when have u ever seen a controversal tournament thread so civil??? If a new user really thinks that a forum thread about a game billed as "The Battle of the Elite" is something thats going to look appealing??? lets hope he doesnt read the Smack thread.
As I said before, "I'm not discrediting either you or RP". If you have an issue that I can see his side, that is your issue. If anyone has an issue that I can ALSO see your side, that's their issue. This is an open discussion, and I am fine with that, providing it can be discussed with some level of professionalism or tact. please allow me go on the record in my trust that you would never delete a post only move it to Smack IF you felt it deemed nessecary And i completly trust you to decide what topics or threads are moved to Smack and why. It's your Call and one of the reasons i wanted you as a moderator I do not agree with the constant bashing of an individual in an Open Discussion. If there is a need to bash, then the topic can be moved to the Smack Talk area. I don't believe stating facts that neither party disagree with could be called discrediting that person......After all President Clinton wrote: I did not have sex with that woman! is on the record and it is what he said" In open discussion i dont believe in a post that says Screw Space Ghost but i wont presume to move a post where or when u can. If I am incorrect in this view, then perhaps the "powers to be" would either be willing to tell me what guidelines to follow to know what is open discussion and what is smack/garbage. Or perhaps I need to be replaced as a moderator. Either way, I stand by my comments. My interest is the game, to get new players in the game, to be a help to the community here. you are not incorrect with your view infact i pretty much trust your judgement to move any post including one of my own.... to the smack forum if you feel it breached any guidelines i've only asked that posts dont get deleted as former mods and admins have done in the past. I want there to be no perception that you are being Bullied by me Or that your someone's Puppet.
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:00 pm |
|
 |
|
Admin 1
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2000 3:00 am Posts: 1432 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Runaway Proton wrote: SG, Your own Sig; Runaway Proton B.O.T.E 2007 Sysop wrote: I did my best to support the rules that were established before the game which were few.It was established that there were to be no substitutes once the game started. Space Ghost wrote: I have no rason to Haunte this individual,,Or make posts and replies to him or Stalke any of his threads...I'M THE BIG BAD GHOST who bullied RP and needs to be reeled in? I only wanted him to not try and steal the Tournament name...If i succeded Good...If he doesnt want to Host future tournaments because of me,,,,,Then i've done this community a Great Service They wont have to play a Game for months only to find out that in the begining of the game they sysop decided to "Keep it under the radar" when he cheated.. If your asking me to forgive RP im not prepared to do so...I will leave him alone as long as he doesnt try to steal a tourny's name or tradition that he has no rights to do so any more then i have the rights to do so. If you've no reason to continue to Haunte me, them please remove your sig. I'm done with trying to cater to, or fight with you. I made the decision to put this tournament to rest for the very reasons Thrawn has mentioned. It's not good for the game, nor it is good for me to put up with all the SH** I have reguarding this issue. I'm done with it, I'm moving on, please do the same as you promised you would. For someone who doesnt want to fight with me..You might maybe remove any reference of ME from your website.
|
| Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:35 pm |
|
 |
|
Promethius
Ambassador
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:00 am Posts: 3141 Location: Kansas
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Space Ghost wrote: [color=orange] Really? seems to me UTW hosted two tournys this year with ZERO complaints about a Cheating Sysop. not one tourny but 2 tournies..AND NO PROBLEMS.....Big Game 08 and Big Chess Both held on UTW with ZERO problems.....wonder why we ( me and parrothead) Had 0 fights anf 0 problems with a server Sysop thru 2 tournies.
I guess my view of what a tournament is, is different from most. I would think a tournament would consist of a minimum of 5, 4 to 6-man corps. Two corps just sounds like A vs B that we see in a lot of normal games. As for drama, this issue regarding B.O.T.E. of last year continues to drag on and does nothing but drive players away. The post by PT_Nation was right on target in his/her brief assessment. No fun, why play this game? My thought again is that tournaments are nothing above a normal game other than the advertising.
_________________
/ Promethius / Enigma / Wolfen /
"A man who has no skills can be taught, a man who has no honor has nothing."
|
| Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:18 am |
|
 |
|
Admin 1
Site Admin
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2000 3:00 am Posts: 1432 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Promethius wrote: Space Ghost wrote: Really? seems to me UTW hosted two tournys this year with ZERO complaints about a Cheating Sysop. not one tourny but 2 tournies..AND NO PROBLEMS.....Big Game 08 and Big Chess Both held on UTW with ZERO problems.....wonder why we ( me and parrothead) Had 0 fights anf 0 problems with a server Sysop thru 2 tournies.
My thought again is that tournaments are nothing above a normal game other than the advertising. Tournament ARE nothing above a normal game other then the advertising and the amount of people who play them...Sure..ok so what???. As for a tournament defined by 5 Teams- 4-6 man teams Im not even sure BOTE had 5 teams last year...What about games with 2 teams and 7-12 people each team..Would you consider THAT a tournament???..As for the Drama chasing away players ...It attracts them to the forums as well.....Also Dont assume the Authenticity of the Account. Should the thread just be moved to smack to end that argument? regardless my "Drama" is over with this subject but i'll respond to anyone and still visit it from time to time Like i said before if it hadnt been for these discussions we wouldnt of even known about what happened.
|
| Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:23 am |
|
 |
|
Singularity
Veteran Op
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:00 am Posts: 5558 Location: USA
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Quote: Tournament ARE nothing above a normal game other then the advertising and the amount of people who play them...Sure..ok so what???. As for a tournament defined by 5 Teams- 4-6 man teams Im not even sure BOTE had 5 teams last year...What about games with 2 teams and 7-12 people each team..Would you consider THAT a tournament???..As for the Drama chasing away players ...It attracts them to the forums as well.....Also Dont assume the Authenticity of the Account. Can't speak for everyone, but I can for me... the BS that precedes, then follows, big games like that is one of the 3 reasons why I don't play them anymore. 2 teams is ridiculous tho. It would all come down to whichever team CEO gives a f***. The one that does, wins, the one that doesn't, loses. Tell me the team leaders and I'll tell you who'll win, the other 11 players might as well just bot... because it won't matter one bit.
_________________ May the unholy fires of corbomite ignite deep within the depths of your soul...
1. TWGS server @ twgs.navhaz.com 2. The NavHaz Junction - Tradewars 2002 Scripts, Resources and Downloads 3. Open IRC chat @ irc.freenode.net:6667 #twchan 4. Parrothead wrote: Jesus wouldn't Subspace Crawl.
*** SG memorial donations via paypal to: dpocky68@booinc.com
|
| Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:31 am |
|
 |
|
Promethius
Ambassador
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:00 am Posts: 3141 Location: Kansas
|
 Re: B.O.T.E. 2008 In Planning
Space Ghost wrote: Promethius wrote: Space Ghost wrote: Really? seems to me UTW hosted two tournys this year with ZERO complaints about a Cheating Sysop. not one tourny but 2 tournies..AND NO PROBLEMS.....Big Game 08 and Big Chess Both held on UTW with ZERO problems.....wonder why we ( me and parrothead) Had 0 fights anf 0 problems with a server Sysop thru 2 tournies.
My thought again is that tournaments are nothing above a normal game other than the advertising. Tournament ARE nothing above a normal game other then the advertising and the amount of people who play them...Sure..ok so what???. As for a tournament defined by 5 Teams- 4-6 man teams Im not even sure BOTE had 5 teams last year...What about games with 2 teams and 7-12 people each team..Would you consider THAT a tournament???..As for the Drama chasing away players ...It attracts them to the forums as well.....Also Dont assume the Authenticity of the Account. Should the thread just be moved to smack to end that argument? regardless my "Drama" is over with this subject but i'll respond to anyone and still visit it from time to time Like i said before if it hadnt been for these discussions we wouldnt of even known about what happened. Nothing smack in the above quotes to require a move.
_________________
/ Promethius / Enigma / Wolfen /
"A man who has no skills can be taught, a man who has no honor has nothing."
|
| Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:52 pm |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|